Rule 612. Refreshing Recollection

  • Rule 612. Writing used to refresh memory
    militarydefenselawyers391If a witness uses a writing to refresh his or her memory for the purpose of testifying, either          (1) while testifying, or                                                (2) before testifying, if the military judge determines it is necessary in the interests of justice, an adverse party is entitled to have the writing produced at the hearing, to inspect it, to crossexamine the witness thereon, and to introduce in evidence those portions which relate to the testimony of the witness. If it is claimed that the writing contains privileged information or matters not related to the subject matter of the testimony, the military judge shall examine the writing in camera, excise any privileged information or portions not so related, and order delivery of the remainder to the party entitled thereto. Any portion withheld over objections shall be attached to the record of trial as an appellate exhibit. If a writing is not produced or delivered pursuant to order under this rule, the military judge shall make any order justice requires, except that when the prosecution elects not to comply, the order shall be one striking the testimony or, if in the discretion of the military judge it is determined that the interests of justice so required, declaring a mistrial. This rule does not preclude disclosure of information required to be disclosed under other provisions of these rules or this Manual.
  1. This is NOT Rule 803(5), the recorded recollection hearsay exception.
  2. Foundation and Procedure. Show the memory of the witness has failed; show
    there is some means available which will refresh the recollection of the witness;
    have the witness read/examine the refreshing document silently; recover the
    refreshing document; proceed with questioning; make the refreshing document
    an appellate exhibit and append it to the record of trial; protect privileged matters
    contained in the writing; nothing is read into the record. Refreshing document
    need not be admissible; and opposing counsel may inspect the writing, use it in
    cross examination, and introduce it into evidence.

This is NOT Rule 803(5),

Foundation and Procedure.