- The military judge’s ruling to issue or not issue an instruction that is not required istested for abuse of discretion. United States v. Thompson , 31 M.J. 125 (C.M.A. 1990); United States v. Forbes , 61 M.J. 354 (C.A.A.F. 2005).
- Failure to object to an erroneous instruction or to request an omitted (non-mandatory)instruction constitutes waiver. R.C.M. 920(f). This triggers plain error analysis, United States v. Kasper , 58 M.J. 314 (C.A.A.F. 2003).
- The test for prejudice depends on whether the error was of constitutional dimension. See generally United States v. Forbes , 61 M.J. 354 (C.A.A.F. 2005).
All info submitted will be kept confidential and private. We will contact you via e-mail or phone for a free initial consultation with a military defense lawyer. An attorney client relationship is not established by submitting this initial contact information to our office.
Gonzalez & Waddington, LLCGonzalez and Waddington defend Army, Air Force, Navy, Marine Corps, and Coast Guard cases in the US, Germany, England, Italy, Spain, Sicily, Europe, Turkey, Bahrain, Kuwait, Iraq, Cyprus, Korea, Hawaii, Guam, and Japan.Phone: (866) 969-9860