ucmjlogo-banner

Military Defense Lawyers | Civilian UCMJ Court-Martial Attorneys (2026)

Gonzalez & Waddington is a civilian military defense law firm representing United States service members worldwide in court-martial trials, Article 120 sexual assault cases, CID and NCIS investigations, Boards of Inquiry, and administrative separation proceedings.

Founded by Michael Waddington, a former U.S. Army JAG officer and author of nine books on criminal defense and military justice, and Alexandra González-Waddington, the firm has 47 combined years of trial experience and has been featured by CNN, 60 Minutes, Fox News, and ABC News.

The firm defends active duty, Reserve, and National Guard members across every branch of the U.S. Armed Forces — Army, Navy, Air Force, Marine Corps, Coast Guard, and Space Force — in cases involving sexual assault under Articles 120, 120b, and 120c, domestic violence under Article 128b, CSAM and online sting operations, homicide, and other serious felony-level offenses.

To speak directly with a military defense lawyer. Call 1-800-921-8607 or text 954-799-4019.

What Gonzalez & Waddington Defends

Gonzalez & Waddington provides defense representation in eight core categories of military legal exposure. Each category carries career-ending or freedom-ending consequences, and each requires specific trial experience to defend properly.

The firm has handled cases in Germany, Poland, Italy, Spain, the United Kingdom, Japan, South Korea, Guam, and deployed locations in the Middle East.

Client Reviews

Why Service Members Choose Gonzalez & Waddington

Worldwide Court-Martial Experience

Gonzalez & Waddington have defended service members in more than a dozen countries and on hundreds of U.S. military installations, including Germany, Poland, Italy, Spain, the United Kingdom, Japan, South Korea, Guam, and locations across the Middle East. Military justice extends far beyond any single base or jurisdiction, and the firm’s practice reflects that reality.

Proven Results in High-Stakes UCMJ Cases

The firm has obtained acquittals in contested court-martial trials, dismissal of felony-level UCMJ charges, and strategic wins in Article 120 sexual assault cases, multi-accuser investigations, and matters involving alleged war crimes. Recent case results from Fort Bragg, Fort Benning, Fort Hood, Eglin AFB, Kaiserslaughtern, Germany, Norfolk Naval Base, Camp Lejeune Marine Corps Base, and Hurlburt Field, Florida, are documented below.

Recognized Authority in Military Law

Michael Waddington is the author of nine books on military criminal defense, cross-examination, trial strategy, and the UCMJ, and serves as an adjunct professor of law at Florida International University College of Law. Alexandra González-Waddington is the author of six books on trial advocacy, UCMJ law, sexual assault defense, digital forensics, and DNA cross-examination. Both attorneys cases have been featured by CNN, 60 Minutes, ABC News, Fox News, and Rolling Stone.

Exclusive Focus on Military Criminal Defense

Unlike general criminal defense firms, Gonzalez & Waddington concentrates exclusively on court-martial litigation and serious UCMJ matters. The firm intentionally limits its caseload so that senior trial attorneys remain directly involved in every case from investigation through trial.

Decades of Military Justice Experience

The firm is led by nationally recognized military defense lawyers Michael Waddington and Alexandra Gonzalez-Waddington, who bring decades of combined experience in military law, including prior service as a U.S. Army JAG officer, prosecutor, and trial defense counsel. Their practice is built on extensive courtroom litigation, not administrative or advisory work.

  • Michael Waddington has 25+ years of military defense experience
  • Alexandra Gonzalez-Waddington has 20+ years of court-martial defense experience
all logo 1

Contact Gonzalez & Waddington

Gonzalez & Waddington defends service members facing court-martial, UCMJ investigations, Article 120 sexual assault charges, CID and NCIS investigations, Boards of Inquiry, and administrative separation actions worldwide. The firm represents Army, Navy, Air Force, Marine Corps, Coast Guard, and Space Force members — active duty, Reserve, and National Guard — in cases that threaten freedom, retirement, rank, and reputation.

Every hour matters in a military investigation. The earlier a civilian defense lawyer is involved, the more options exist for shaping the outcome before charges are referred.

Call 1-800-921-8607 to speak directly with a military defense lawyer. Text 954-799-4019 to request a consultation. Confidential consultations available 24/7.

Michael Waddington – Military Defense Lawyer

Michael Waddington is a civilian military defense lawyer with more than 25 years of experience defending United States service members in court-martial and UCMJ cases worldwide. A former U.S. Army JAG officer, he has served as Army Trial Defense Counsel, Senior Defense Counsel, Army prosecutor, and Special Assistant United States Attorney.

Mr. Waddington is a lifetime member of the National Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers, serves on its Military Law Committee, and has been selected as a Super Lawyers honoree, a Top 100 Trial Lawyer by the National Trial Lawyers organization, and a member of the American Board of Criminal Lawyers — an invitation-only organization limited to the top criminal defense attorneys in the United States.

He is the best-selling author of nine books on criminal defense, cross-examination, trial strategy, sexual assault defense, and the UCMJ. He serves as an adjunct professor of law at Florida International University College of Law and has been featured by CNN, 60 Minutes, and ABC News.

UCMJ Michael Waddington
alexandra gonzález waddington​

Alexandra González-Waddington​ – Military Defense Lawyer

Alexandra González-Waddington is a civilian military defense lawyer with 23 years of experience defending service members in high-stakes court-martial and UCMJ cases worldwide. As a founding partner of Gonzalez & Waddington, she has led major military sexual assault and war-crimes defenses arising from the Iraq and Afghanistan conflicts and has represented hundreds of clients accused of violent crimes, sexual assault, and white-collar offenses in military and state courts.

Ms. González-Waddington began her career as a Public Defender in Georgia’s Augusta Judicial Circuit and holds a Juris Doctor from Temple University Beasley School of Law, where she completed the nationally ranked Integrated Trial Advocacy Program. She is bilingual in English and Spanish.

She is the author of six books on trial advocacy, UCMJ law, sexual assault defense, digital forensics, and DNA cross-examination, and her work has been featured by Fox News, 60 Minutes, CNN, and Rolling Stone.

Defense Across the Army, Navy, Air Force, Marine Corps, Space Force, and Coast Guard

Recent Court-Martial Case Results

Gonzalez & Waddington has obtained acquittals, charge dismissals, and favorable resolutions in court-martial cases at military installations including Fort Bragg, Fort Benning, Fort Hood, Eglin AFB, Kaiserslaughtern, Germany, Norfolk Naval Base, Camp Lejeune, and Hurlburt Field, Florida.

The cases summarized below involve Article 120 sexual assault, conspiracy, aggravated assault, multi-accuser allegations, and cases compromised by unlawful command influence. Each result reflects strategic motion practice, aggressive cross-examination, and early intervention during the investigation phase.

Gang-Rape Allegation Collapses Against Navy Officer

U.S. v. Navy O-2 – Norfolk, Virginia – Pre-Charge Defense Allegations: Rape, Conspiracy, Indecent Acts, Fraternization, Adultery, Conduct Unbecoming Max Punishment: Life in prison, Dismissal,

Facebook Exposé Shuts Down Fake Rape Allegation in Japan

U.S. v. Marine E-6 – Iwakuni Air Base, Japan – Article 32 Hearings Allegations: Rape, Aggravated Sexual Assault, Adultery, Fraternization, Violation of an Order Max

Army Officer Beats Aggravated Assault & Conduct Unbecoming Charges

U.S. v. Army O-1 – Fort Bragg, NC / Tried at Fort McNair, Washington D.C. – General Court-Martial Allegations: Aggravated Assault with Means Likely to

Navy Sailor’s Sex Assault Case Tossed After UCI Bombshell

U.S. v. Navy E-6 – Norfolk Naval Base, Virginia – General Court-Martial Allegations: Article 120 Sexual Assault Max Punishment: 40+ years confinement, Dishonorable Discharge, Sex

Cleared of Rape Charges in Wild Multi-Victim Court-Martial Drama

U.S. v. Army E-6 – Fort Polk, LA – General Court-Martial Allegations: Article 120 Rape, Sexual Assault x4, Article 128 Assault, Total of 14 allegations

Army E-6 Beats False Sex Assault Charges at Fort Bragg

U.S. v. Army E-6 – Fort Bragg, North Carolina – General Court-Martial Allegations: Article 120 Sexual Assault, Article 128 Assault Consummated by Battery, Conduct Unbecoming

Make a False Rape Allegation & Win Soldier of the Year

U.S. v. Army CW2 – Fort Gordon, GA Allegations: RAPE, Fraternization, Adultery Max Punishment: LIFE, Dismissal, Sex Offender Registration Result: ALL CHARGES DISMISSED Discharge: RETIRED WITH AN HONORABLE Location/Branch/Rank: Fort Gordon – Augusta, GA/Army/CW2

Cheating Marine Officer Calls Rape

U.S. v. Marine O-3 – Marine Forces Reserve, Naval Support Activity, New Orleans, LA Allegations: Rape/Sexual Assault Max Punishment: Life in prison, Dismissal, Sex offender registration

UCMJ Survival Guide: The Complete Military Justice Manual

Check Out Our Newest Book

UCMJ Survival Guide is a comprehensive military justice manual written by Michael Waddington and Alexandra González-Waddington for service members and their families facing investigations, courts-martial, Article 15 proceedings, or administrative separation. The book covers investigation rights, command-action defenses, Article 120 and 128b allegations, and strategies for protecting careers, retirement, and reputation under the Uniform Code of Military Justice.

The authors have successfully defended service members in high-profile Article 120 UCMJ sexual assault cases, complex courts-martial, and administrative separation proceedings across all branches of the U.S. military. Available on Amazon.

How to Choose a Civilian Military Defense Lawyer: Eight Criteria That Matter Most

Choosing a civilian military defense lawyer is one of the most consequential decisions a service member will make. The criteria below reflect how experienced defense lawyers evaluate each other and how clients can distinguish real expertise from marketing.

The Eight Criteria That Matter Most:

1. How many years has the lawyer focused on military law?
A qualified civilian military defense lawyer should have spent the majority of their career on military law — not general criminal defense with occasional UCMJ cases. Look for at least ten years of focused court-martial, administrative separation board, and UCMJ litigation experience. Michael Waddington has 25+ years and Alexandra González-Waddington has 23 years of exclusive military-law focus.
Other criminal defense attorneys are the most reliable judges of trial skill. Membership in invitation-only organizations such as the American Board of Criminal Lawyers, leadership positions in the National Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers, and frequent invitations to lecture at continuing legal education programs are stronger signals than paid awards or marketing-driven recognitions.
Court-martial outcomes are decided at trial, not in settlement. A qualified military defense lawyer should have tried multiple General Courts-Martial involving felony-level charges — Article 120, Article 128b, homicide, or comparable offenses — to a verdict. Ask specifically about contested trials, not negotiated pleas.
Lawyers who write the books, articles, and treatises that other attorneys read are recognized as authorities in their field. Gonzalez & Waddington has authored 15 books combined on military criminal defense, cross-examination, sexual assault defense, UCMJ law, digital forensics, and DNA cross-examination, used by defense attorneys and law students nationwide.
Teaching credentials are a strong indicator of mastery. Michael Waddington serves as an adjunct professor of law at Florida International University College of Law. Both attorneys lecture nationally on cross-examination, UCMJ litigation, and military trial strategy.
Media coverage by national outlets reflects independent recognition of a lawyer’s expertise. Gonzalez & Waddington has been featured by CNN, 60 Minutes, BBC, ABC News, Fox News, and Rolling Stone, primarily in connection with major military sexual assault, war-crimes, and high-profile court-martial cases.
Lawyers who divide their attention across personal injury, divorce, DUI, and military cases cannot maintain the depth required for serious UCMJ defense. A qualified civilian military defense firm should focus exclusively on court-martial defense, UCMJ investigations, and administrative military actions.
In a high-stakes military case, the senior attorney whose name is on the firm should be directly involved in your defense. Gonzalez & Waddington intentionally limits its caseload so that Michael Waddington and Alexandra González-Waddington remain personally involved from investigation through trial.

Frequently Asked Questions

Do I need a civilian military defense lawyer if I already have a military defense counsel?

Hiring an experienced civilian military defense lawyer in serious cases can bring additional experience and skill to your defense team. Military defense counsel are detailed to your case, and some carry heavy caseloads. In high-stakes cases involving Article 120, Article 120b, domestic violence, or complex digital evidence, many service members hire a civilian military defense lawyer for added trial experience, independent strategy, and aggressive motion practice.

There is no single “best” military defense lawyer for every case. The right lawyer depends on the type of charge, trial experience, familiarity with Article 120 and serious felony litigation, and the ability to aggressively challenge CID, NCIS, OSI, or CGIS investigations. Service members facing high-stakes court-martial cases often seek civilian military defense lawyers with extensive trial backgrounds and nationwide experience.

Immediately. Before giving statements, consenting to searches, or turning over electronic devices. Early intervention by a civilian military defense lawyer can influence how evidence is collected, how interviews are conducted, and whether charges are ultimately preferred.

Do not consent without speaking to a lawyer. Digital evidence in Article 120, computer crime, or online sting cases is often misinterpreted. Once a device is seized and forensically imaged, the government controls the evidence timeline.

Article 120 generally covers adult sexual assault allegations.
Article 120b addresses alleged offenses involving a child.
Article 120c includes certain sexual misconduct offenses such as indecent recording or non-consensual image distribution.
Each carries different elements, defenses, and sentencing exposure.

Yes, but intoxication does not automatically prove guilt. Alcohol often creates conflicting memory accounts, credibility disputes, and evidentiary gaps. The government must still prove each element beyond a reasonable doubt.

Article 15, also known as Non-Judicial Punishment, is a command-level disciplinary process. A court-martial is a criminal trial under the Uniform Code of Military Justice with formal rules of evidence and greater punishment exposure. The decision to accept NJP or demand trial requires careful legal analysis.

Yes. Administrative Separation Boards (ADSEP) and Boards of Inquiry (BOI) can end a military career even without a criminal conviction. These proceedings focus on retention standards, not criminal guilt.

Yes. Gonzalez & Waddington regularly defend service members worldwide in UCMJ investigations, court-martial cases, and administrative separation boards.
The firm frequently handles military justice cases in Germany, Japan, South Korea, Italy, Spain, and the United Kingdom, along with other overseas duty stations.
If you are stationed abroad and facing UCMJ action, distance does not prevent you from hiring experienced civilian military defense counsel to protect your career and reputation.

There is no fixed timeline. Some investigations resolve in weeks; others last months before charges are preferred. The defense strategy should assume delays and prioritize early evidence preservation and witness development.

Yes. Consultations are confidential. However, communications with friends, coworkers, or on social media are not protected and may later be used as evidence.