Military Defense & Court-Martial Lawyers

Gonzalez & Waddington are court-martial defense attorneys: civilian military defense lawyers who represent U.S. service members facing criminal charges, investigations, and adverse administrative action under the Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ). The firm represents Soldiers, Sailors, Airmen, Marines, Guardians, and Coast Guardsmen worldwide in court-martial trials, Article 120 sexual assault cases, CID, NCIS, OSI, and CGIS investigations, command and AR 15-6 investigations, GOMOR and letter of reprimand rebuttals, Article 15 nonjudicial punishment, Boards of Inquiry, and administrative separation boards.

Gonzalez & Waddington at a glance

Firm	Gonzalez & Waddington, LLC, a civilian military defense law firm
Founding partners	Michael Waddington, former U.S. Army JAG officer, and Alexandra González-Waddington
Trial experience	47 combined years
Cases	Courts-martial and Article 120 sexual assault defense; CID, NCIS, OSI and CGIS investigations; command investigations and AR 15-6 investigation rebuttals; GOMOR and letter of reprimand rebuttals; Article 15 / NJP; administrative separation boards and Boards of Inquiry; sexual harassment, violent crime, financial crime and other UCMJ offenses
Who we defend	Active duty, Reserve and National Guard members of the Army, Navy, Air Force, Marine Corps, Space Force and Coast Guard, worldwide
Books	Together, Michael Waddington and Alexandra González-Waddington have written 14 books on criminal defense, cross-examination, trial advocacy and military justice
Teaching	Michael Waddington is an adjunct professor at Florida International University College of Law, where he teaches UCMJ military law and the Law of Armed Conflict, and he teaches at national CLE conferences, including NACDL. Alexandra González-Waddington also teaches at national CLE conferences, including NACDL.
Media	CNN, 60 Minutes, Fox News, ABC News, Rolling Stone
Contact	Call 1-800-921-8607 · Text 954-799-4019 · 1792 Bell Tower Ln, #218, Weston, FL 33326

The firm was founded by Michael Waddington, a former U.S. Army JAG officer, and Alexandra González-Waddington. Together they have 47 combined years of trial experience, have defended service members at U.S. military installations around the world, and have written 14 books on criminal defense, cross-examination, and military justice. Their work has been featured by CNN, 60 Minutes, Fox News, and ABC News.

The firm defends active duty, Reserve, and National Guard members across every branch of the U.S. Armed Forces — Army, Navy, Air Force, Marine Corps, Coast Guard, and Space Force — in cases involving sexual assault under Articles 120, 120b, and 120c, domestic violence under Article 128b, CSAM and online sting operations, homicide, and other serious felony-level offenses.

To speak directly with a military defense lawyer, call 1-800-921-8607 or text 954-799-4019.

Gonzalez & Waddington is a civilian military defense firm, founded by Michael Waddington and Alexandra Gonzalez-Waddington, that has defended service members at courts-martial and in UCMJ matters worldwide for more than two decades.

Talk to a military defense lawyer today

If you are under investigation, facing charges, or dealing with a GOMOR, Article 15, or separation board, get advice before you talk to anyone. Tell us what is going on and a civilian military defense lawyer will contact you. What you share with us is confidential.

Call 1-800-921-8607 or text 954-799-4019, 24/7
Advice before you talk to CID, NCIS, OSI, CGIS, or your command
Service members in every branch, stationed anywhere in the world

Need legal help?

Fill out this form, call 1-800-921-8607 or text 954-799-4019 to request a consultation.

Client Reviews

More than 200 client reviews: rated Excellent on Google (61 reviews), and on Avvo, Michael Waddington is rated 4.9 out of 5 (104 reviews) and Alexandra González-Waddington 4.8 out of 5 (44 reviews), both with an Avvo Rating of 10.0 “Superb.” Read client testimonials.

      EXCELLENT  
   Based on 61 reviews 
    
 
 
 
   
 
 
       Posted on Google  
   
   Gage Rickenbach 
 
 
 
 Trustindex verifies that the original source of the review is Google. Exceptional defense attorney. Highly recommend his service with any military matters.
  
 
      Posted on Google  
   
   Kortne Randolph 
 
 
 
 Trustindex verifies that the original source of the review is Google. Michael Waddington handled my case with an exceptional level of professionalism from start to finish. He was knowledgeable, prepared, responsive, and extremely thorough. He took the time to understand the facts and never treated the case like just another file.

What I appreciated most was the way he approached the defense. He challenged the facts, paid attention to the smallest details, and was not afraid to push back when something didn't add up. At the same time, he remained professional and composed throughout the process.

You can tell that Michael takes his clients and his work seriously. He is the type of attorney who gives you confidence that your case is in capable hands. I would highly recommend him to anyone looking for a dedicated and professional military defense attorney.
  
 
      Posted on Google  
   
   Matthew Juntz 
 
 
 
 Trustindex verifies that the original source of the review is Google. Michael Waddington and Alexandra Gonzalez-Waddington provided exceptional representation during one of the most serious and stressful professional challenges of my military career. They were highly knowledgeable, thoroughly prepared, responsive, and aggressive when necessary, while always remaining professional and focused on the evidence.

Michael’s courtroom advocacy, strategic judgment, and ability to expose inconsistencies in the allegations were outstanding. Alexandra was equally impressive in preparing the case, organizing the evidence, coordinating witnesses and logistics, and ensuring that every important issue was addressed. They worked extremely well as a team and made sure I understood the process and was prepared at every stage.

Their preparation and advocacy made a meaningful difference in the outcome of my case. I am extremely grateful for their professionalism, dedication, and commitment, and I would strongly recommend them to any service member facing a serious military legal matter.
  
 
      Posted on Google  
   
   Soeb M 
 
 
 
 Trustindex verifies that the original source of the review is Google. Being falsely accused of sexual assault and domestic violence was the most difficult experience of my life. Overnight, my freedom, military career, reputation, and future were all on the line. I knew I needed an attorney with exceptional experience in military justice, and choosing Michael Waddington was one of the most important decisions I have ever made.

If you're looking for the best military defense lawyers, my advice is simple: call Michael Waddington.

Throughout the entire process, Michael was honest, direct, and exceptionally prepared. But what impressed me most was watching him in the courtroom. His command of the facts, attention to detail, strategic thinking, and ability to expose weaknesses in the government's case gave me confidence when I needed it most. He was calm under pressure, persuasive, and never lost sight of what mattered most—making sure the facts were heard.

After one of the hardest battles of my life, I walked out of the courtroom fully acquitted. I will never forget that moment or everything Michael did to help me get there.

No one ever wants to find themselves in a situation like mine, but if you do, you need someone who will fight for you with everything they have. Michael Waddington stood by me through the most difficult chapter of my life, and I will always be grateful for everything he did.
  
 
      Posted on Google  
   
   L Aguillard 
 
 
 
 Trustindex verifies that the original source of the review is Google. As a retired military officer, I know how serious the military justice system is and how much is at stake when a service member faces false allegations. When my brother-in-law found himself in that position, our family knew we needed an attorney with extensive experience in military law.

If you're searching for the best military defense lawyer, I wholeheartedly recommend Michael Waddington.

Throughout this process, Michael demonstrated professionalism, integrity, and an exceptional understanding of military justice. He was always straightforward with our family, thoroughly prepared, and focused on ensuring that the facts—not assumptions—were presented in court.

Seeing my brother-in-law walk out of the courtroom fully acquitted was an unforgettable moment for our family. We will always be grateful for Michael's dedication, hard work, and commitment to achieving justice.

He has earned my trust, my respect, and my sincere gratitude. I hope no service member or family ever finds themselves in this position, but if they do, I would want Michael Waddington standing beside them.
  
 
      Posted on Google  
   
   Rezvin Kern 
 
 
 
 Trustindex verifies that the original source of the review is Google. When my brother was facing false allegations of sexual assault and domestic violence, our family found ourselves in one of the most frightening and overwhelming situations we have ever experienced. Watching someone you love fight for their freedom, reputation, military career, and future is something I would never wish on anyone.

If you're looking for the best military defense lawyer, I recommend Michael Waddington without hesitation.

From the very beginning, Michael was professional, compassionate, and exceptionally prepared. It was clear that he knew the case inside and out and was committed to making sure the facts—not assumptions—were what mattered in the courtroom. Throughout the process, he kept our family informed, answered our questions honestly, and gave us confidence during an incredibly difficult time.

False allegations can turn a person's entire life upside down. Michael understood exactly what was at stake and fought tirelessly for my brother.

Because of Michael's dedication and advocacy, my brother walked out of the courtroom fully acquitted, with his freedom, his honor, and the opportunity to move forward with his life. Our family will always be grateful for everything he did.

Choosing Michael Waddington was one of the best decisions our family has ever made. He has earned our family's complete trust, deepest gratitude, and highest respect!
  
 
      Posted on Google  
   
   Sheila Frahm 
 
 
 
 Trustindex verifies that the original source of the review is Google. I highly recommend the law firm of Gonzalez and Waddington if you are ever faced with the need for strong representation. Michael handled my son’s case efficiently and thoroughly. Alexandra was prompt to reply to my concerns and I truly felt as though they cared about my son. They will always be held in high regard by me and I cannot fully express my sincere appreciation and gratitude to them!
  
 
      Posted on Google  
   
   John Murphy 
 
 
 
 Trustindex verifies that the original source of the review is Google. Michael was amazing and his communication and interaction with his clients was flawless. The detail in which he handled the case was thorough and effective awesome job thanks again
  
 
      Posted on Google  
   
   Chad Elwood 
 
 
 
 Trustindex verifies that the original source of the review is Google. I was wrongly accused under articles 120, 128b, and 130, and the legal battle was an incredibly draining experience. Throughout the two-and-a-half-year ordeal, Michael and Alexandra displayed unmatched professionalism, deep legal expertise, and genuine care for my case. Michael's collaboration with my ADC was seamless, and he ensured I fully understood every step. His closing argument during the trial was masterful, exposing flaws in the prosecution’s case and solidifying my trust in their exceptional abilities. Thanks to their unwavering dedication, justice prevailed, and my family and I can finally feel at peace. If you need a powerhouse defense team, they are the ones to trust.
  
 
      Posted on Google  
   
   Madison Murphy 
 
 
 
 Trustindex verifies that the original source of the review is Google. My husband was falsely accused, and it was an incredibly long and difficult process for our family. Throughout everything, Michael was supportive, compassionate, and always available to answer any questions or concerns we had.
He truly cares about his clients and their families, and he fights hard for them every step of the way. Thanks to his dedication and hard work, my husband received a fully acquitted verdict, and we are beyond grateful.
There are honestly no words that can fully express how thankful we are for everything this firm has done for our family. We can finally focus on bigger and better things, and that peace means everything to us. We highly recommend Michael and his firm to anyone in need of a UCMJ defense lawyer.
  
 
  
  
 
 Showing only 5 star reviews
    Verified by Trustindex  Trustindex verified badge is the Universal Symbol of Trust. Only the greatest companies can get the verified badge who has a review score above 4.5, based on customer reviews over the past 12 months. Read more

Testimonials reflect individual clients’ experiences. You may not obtain the same or similar results. No client was paid for a review.

Recent Court-Martial Case Results

Gonzalez & Waddington has obtained acquittals, charge dismissals, and favorable resolutions in court-martial cases at military installations including Fort Bragg, Fort Benning, Fort Hood, Eglin AFB, Kaiserslautern, Germany, Norfolk Naval Base, Camp Lejeune, and Hurlburt Field, Florida.

The cases summarized below involve Article 120 sexual assault, conspiracy, aggravated assault, multi-accuser allegations, and cases compromised by unlawful command influence. Each result reflects strategic motion practice, aggressive cross-examination, and early intervention during the investigation phase.

Air Force PPP Fraud Court-Martial — Full Acquittal | Goodfellow AFB, Texas

A U.S. Air Force officer assigned to Goodfellow Air Force Base faced theft, government fraud, and conspiracy charges involving COVID-era Paycheck Protection Program (PPP) loans during her previous assignment in Monterey, California. Gonzalez & Waddington defended the officer at a judge-alone court-martial, exposing gaps in the Air Force Office of Special Investigations (OSI) investigation and challenging investigators’ failure to examine evidence favorable to the defense. An independent forensic accountant presented by the defense explained the financial evidence. The military judge found the officer not guilty of all charges and specifications.

U.S. Air Force | Goodfellow AFB, Texas | 2026

Navy Sexual Harassment Separation Board — Retained on Active Duty | NAS Pensacola, Florida

A U.S. Navy petty officer nearing retirement faced administrative separation over allegations of sexual harassment and a toxic work environment during an assignment in Djibouti. Multiple complaining witnesses accused the sailor of misconduct that threatened his career and opportunity to reach retirement. At the contested administrative separation board, Gonzalez & Waddington challenged the witnesses’ credibility and motives through cross-examination and presented military character testimony supporting continued service. The board retained the petty officer on active duty.

U.S. Navy | NAS Pensacola, Florida | 2026

Army Harassment and Maltreatment Separation Board — Retained | Fort Sill, Oklahoma

A U.S. Army sergeant faced administrative separation for alleged harassment, abuse, maltreatment of subordinates, and fraternization at Fort Sill and during a deployment to Jordan. Michael Waddington challenged inconsistencies and falsehoods in witness accounts and the investigation’s one-sided conclusions. The defense also presented military character witnesses whose testimony contradicted the government’s portrayal of the sergeant. Despite testimony from multiple officers, including her battalion commander, urging discharge, the board retained the sergeant in the Army.

U.S. Army | Fort Sill, Oklahoma | 2026

Army Officer Board of Inquiry — All Misconduct Unsubstantiated; Officer Retained | Fort Knox, Kentucky

A decorated Army recruiting station commander in Los Angeles faced elimination over allegations of sexual harassment, fraternization, maltreatment, adultery, and other misconduct involving subordinates. The government presented 16 witnesses. At Fort Knox, Michael Waddington and co-counsel conducted extensive cross-examination, including questioning the officer’s battalion commander and other senior officers seeking his discharge. The defense presented evidence that recruiters implicated in recruiting fraud targeted the commander after he uncovered and reported their misconduct. The board found all alleged misconduct unsubstantiated and retained the officer.

U.S. Army | Fort Knox, Kentucky | 2026

Army GOMOR Rebuttal — Local Filing and Retention | Korea

A U.S. Army officer serving in Korea received a General Officer Memorandum of Reprimand (GOMOR) following allegations that he sexually harassed a junior subordinate. Gonzalez & Waddington challenged the underlying investigation and prepared detailed rebuttals, supporting memoranda, and successive requests for relief throughout the review process. The defense sought local filing and an opportunity for continued service. Following multiple levels of review, the GOMOR was filed locally rather than permanently in the officer’s Army Military Human Resource Record, and the officer was retained.

U.S. Army | Korea | 2026

Air Force Rape and Domestic Violence Court-Martial — Full Acquittal | Hurlburt Field, Florida

An Airman at Hurlburt Field faced allegations of rape, strangulation, domestic violence, and other serious offenses following a contentious breakup. Gonzalez & Waddington defended the Airman at a contested court-martial, challenging the government’s evidence and exposing credibility problems in the allegations despite an extensive OSI investigation. After hearing the evidence, the military panel found the Airman not guilty of all charges and specifications, resulting in a full acquittal.

U.S. Air Force | Hurlburt Field, Florida | 2026

Army Sexual Assault Court-Martial — Full Acquittal; Retirement Preserved | Kaiserslautern, Germany

A retirement-eligible Army noncommissioned officer faced sexual assault charges in a court-martial involving forensic evidence, DNA, and expert testimony. Gonzalez & Waddington challenged the government’s forensic evidence and witness testimony, contesting the prosecution’s interpretation of the evidence supporting the allegations. The client was found not guilty of all charges and specifications. Following the full acquittal, the noncommissioned officer was able to retire with benefits.

U.S. Army | Kaiserslautern, Germany | 2026

Navy Sexual Assault Separation Board — Allegations Unsubstantiated; Retained | NAS Corpus Christi, Texas

A student naval aviator faced administrative separation over allegations of sexually assaulting multiple classmates. Gonzalez & Waddington contested the allegations before the separation board, cross-examined witnesses, and presented character evidence supporting the defense. The board found the sexual assault allegations unsubstantiated and retained the officer candidate, rejecting the government’s effort to separate the client from military service.

U.S. Navy | NAS Corpus Christi, Texas | 2026

Show 13 more case results

Army Ranger School GOMOR Rebuttal — Reprimand Rescinded | Fort Benning, Georgia

An Army officer at Fort Benning received a General Officer Memorandum of Reprimand after being accused of cheating during Ranger School land navigation. Gonzalez & Waddington conducted an independent investigation and prepared a detailed GOMOR rebuttal challenging the cheating allegations and the basis for the reprimand. After reviewing the defense submission, the general rescinded the GOMOR and withdrew the adverse action, allowing the officer to continue his Army career.

U.S. Army | Fort Benning, Georgia | 2026

Coast Guard Sexual Harassment Separation Board — All Misconduct Unsubstantiated; Retained | Mobile, Alabama

A Coast Guard E-5 faced allegations of sexual harassment and toxic leadership after disciplining a subordinate. He extended his enlistment twice to contest allegations that threatened his military career. Gonzalez & Waddington represented him at a contested administrative separation board and challenged the government’s case for discharge. The board found all alleged misconduct unsubstantiated and retained him on active duty.

U.S. Coast Guard | Coast Guard Station Mobile, Alabama | 2026

Air Force Article 120 Sexual Assault Case — Charges Dismissed; Client Retired | Hurlburt Field, Florida

A retirement-eligible Air Force E-7 faced allegations of sexual assault, stalking, and abuse following the end of a romantic relationship. During pretrial litigation, Gonzalez & Waddington uncovered significant credibility problems and evidence favorable to the defense. The government ultimately dismissed the charges, resolving the case without a court-martial conviction and allowing the client to retire.

U.S. Air Force | Hurlburt Field, Florida | 2026

Army Article 15 Defense — Action Dismissed | Poland

An Army noncommissioned officer stationed in Poland faced allegations of sexual misconduct and a proposed Article 15 action. Gonzalez & Waddington prepared a detailed defense response package identifying weaknesses in the evidence and credibility concerns surrounding the allegations. The submission gave the imposing commander specific grounds to reconsider the proposed punishment. After reviewing the case, the commander dismissed the Article 15 action.

U.S. Army | Poland | 2026

Defense Contractor Installation Bar — Access Restored | Fort Gordon, Georgia

A retired Army colonel working as a Department of Defense contractor was barred from Fort Gordon after a former romantic partner accused him of misconduct. The installation bar threatened his employment and professional reputation. Gonzalez & Waddington investigated the allegations and challenged the findings supporting the restriction. The defense secured restoration of the client’s installation access, allowing him to continue working at Fort Gordon.

Department of Defense Contractor | Fort Gordon, Georgia | 2026

Navy Article 120b Allegations — No Misconduct Found; Chief Retained | Norfolk, Virginia

A Navy Chief Petty Officer faced serious allegations under Article 120b, UCMJ. The government ultimately pursued administrative separation rather than a court-martial. Gonzalez & Waddington represented the Chief at a contested separation board, challenged the allegations, and exposed weaknesses in the government’s evidence. After hearing the case, the board found no misconduct and retained the Chief on active duty.

U.S. Navy | Naval Station Norfolk, Virginia | 2026

Air Force Officer Article 128b Defense — Court-Martial Not Pursued | Luke AFB, Arizona

An Air Force first lieutenant faced serious domestic violence allegations under Article 128b, UCMJ, during a contentious divorce and child custody dispute. Gonzalez & Waddington challenged weaknesses in the allegations and assisted the officer throughout the military justice proceedings. The government ultimately did not proceed with the court-martial. The officer also rejected Article 15 proceedings and continued his military career.

U.S. Air Force | Luke AFB, Arizona | 2026

Army Sexual Assault Separation Board — All Misconduct Unsubstantiated; Retained | Hohenfels, Germany

An Army soldier stationed in Germany faced administrative separation over sexual assault allegations involving a woman connected to several military police personnel. The soldier denied the allegations and declined a negotiated resolution. Gonzalez & Waddington represented him at a contested administrative separation board and challenged the government’s case for discharge. The board found all alleged misconduct unsubstantiated and retained the soldier on active duty.

U.S. Army | Hohenfels, Germany | 2026

Army Sexual Assault General Court-Martial — Full Acquittal | Fort Bragg, North Carolina

A soldier assigned to Fort Bragg faced allegations of sexually assaulting a woman he met through a dating app while stationed in Germany. He denied the allegations and contested the charges at a general court-martial before an enlisted panel. Gonzalez & Waddington exposed major inconsistencies in the accuser’s statements and cross-examined the government’s DNA expert about testimony that overstated the forensic evidence. The panel found the soldier not guilty of all charges and specifications.

U.S. Army | Fort Bragg, North Carolina | 2025

Navy CSAM Court-Martial — Six-Month Sentence | Norfolk, Virginia

A Navy officer faced allegations involving possession and distribution of child sexual abuse material (CSAM), with the government seeking years of confinement. Gonzalez & Waddington investigated the case, challenged the evidence, and conducted extensive negotiations on the client’s behalf. The case concluded with a six-month sentence, substantially below the years of confinement sought by the government.

U.S. Navy | Naval Station Norfolk, Virginia | 2026

Army Article 120 Sexual Assault Court-Martial — Full Acquittal | Fort Hood, Texas

An Army soldier at Fort Hood faced sexual assault charges under Article 120, UCMJ. He denied the allegations and contested the charges at trial, where the government relied heavily on text messages, DNA evidence, and expert testimony. Gonzalez & Waddington cross-examined the government’s digital forensic and DNA experts, exposing weaknesses in the evidence and challenging the prosecution’s interpretation of the findings. The panel found the soldier not guilty of all charges and specifications.

U.S. Army | Fort Hood, Texas | 2025

Army Chief Warrant Officer 4 Misconduct Defense — Retirement Preserved | Washington, D.C.

An Army Chief Warrant Officer 4 faced misconduct allegations arising from an internal workplace dispute. Gonzalez & Waddington challenged the allegations, contested the investigation, and engaged with command leadership on the officer’s behalf. The matter was resolved without career-ending action, allowing the senior warrant officer to retire with full benefits.

U.S. Army | Military District of Washington | 2026

Army Major Domestic Violence and Sexual Assault Court-Martial — Full Acquittal | Fort Drum, New York

An Army major at Fort Drum faced domestic violence and sexual assault charges stemming from allegations made by his former wife. Gonzalez & Waddington defended the officer at a contested court-martial before an officer panel, challenging the allegations and exposing serious credibility problems in the government’s case. The panel returned not guilty findings on all charges, resulting in a full acquittal.

U.S. Army | Fort Drum, New York | 2025

Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Every case is different. See more court-martial results.

What Gonzalez & Waddington Defends

Gonzalez & Waddington provides defense representation in eight core categories of military legal exposure. Each category carries career-ending or freedom-ending consequences, and each requires specific trial experience to defend properly.

Court-Martial Defense in General, Special, and Summary courts-martial across all branches.
Article 120, 120b, and 120c defense, including military sexual assault, child-related allegations, and indecent conduct or exposure cases.
Article 128b domestic violence and Article 128 assault prosecutions.
CID, NCIS, OSI, and CGIS military investigation defense, including digital device seizures and interrogation representation.
Article 15 / Non-Judicial Punishment strategy, including whether to accept NJP or demand trial by court-martial.
CSAM and online sting operation defense involving computer forensics, cell phone data, and expert cross-examination.
Boards of Inquiry & Administrative Separation defense for officer elimination and enlisted separation proceedings.
Letters of Reprimand, GOMOR rebuttals, adverse evaluations, and other career-impact mitigation.

The firm has handled cases in Germany, Poland, Italy, Spain, the United Kingdom, Japan, South Korea, Guam, and deployed locations in the Middle East.

Why Service Members Choose Gonzalez & Waddington

Worldwide Court-Martial Experience

Gonzalez & Waddington have defended service members in more than a dozen countries and on hundreds of U.S. military installations, including Germany, Poland, Italy, Spain, the United Kingdom, Japan, South Korea, Guam, and locations across the Middle East. Military justice extends far beyond any single base or jurisdiction, and the firm’s practice reflects that reality.

Proven Results in High-Stakes UCMJ Cases

The firm has obtained acquittals in contested court-martial trials, dismissal of felony-level UCMJ charges, and strategic wins in Article 120 sexual assault cases, multi-accuser investigations, and matters involving alleged war crimes. Recent case results from Fort Bragg, Fort Benning, Fort Hood, Eglin AFB, Kaiserslautern, Germany, Norfolk Naval Base, Camp Lejeune Marine Corps Base, and Hurlburt Field, Florida, are documented below.

Recognized Authority in Military Law

Michael Waddington is the author of 14 books on military criminal defense, cross-examination, trial strategy, and the UCMJ, and serves as an adjunct professor of law at Florida International University College of Law. Alexandra González-Waddington is the author of 9 books on trial advocacy, UCMJ law, sexual assault defense, digital forensics, and DNA cross-examination. Both attorneys cases have been featured by CNN, 60 Minutes, ABC News, Fox News, and Rolling Stone.

Exclusive Focus on Military Criminal Defense

Unlike general criminal defense firms, Gonzalez & Waddington concentrates exclusively on court-martial litigation and serious UCMJ matters. The firm intentionally limits its caseload so that senior trial attorneys remain directly involved in every case from investigation through trial.

Decades of Military Justice Experience

The firm is led by nationally recognized military defense lawyers Michael Waddington and Alexandra Gonzalez-Waddington, featured by CNN, 60 Minutes and ABC News, who bring decades of combined experience in military law, including prior service as a U.S. Army JAG officer, prosecutor, and trial defense counsel. Their practice is built on extensive courtroom litigation, not administrative or advisory work.

Michael Waddington has 25+ years of military defense experience
Alexandra Gonzalez-Waddington has 20+ years of court-martial defense experience

As featured in

CNN
CBS 60 Minutes
ABC News
NBC
Fox News
Rolling Stone

Contact Gonzalez & Waddington

Gonzalez & Waddington defends service members facing court-martial, UCMJ investigations, Article 120 sexual assault charges, CID and NCIS investigations, Boards of Inquiry, and administrative separation actions worldwide. The firm represents Army, Navy, Air Force, Marine Corps, Coast Guard, and Space Force members — active duty, Reserve, and National Guard — in cases that threaten freedom, retirement, rank, and reputation.

Every hour matters in a military investigation. The earlier a civilian defense lawyer is involved, the more options exist for shaping the outcome before charges are referred.

Call 1-800-921-8607 to speak directly with a military defense lawyer. Text 954-799-4019 to request a consultation. Confidential consultations available 24/7.

Michael Waddington – Military Defense Lawyer

Michael Waddington is a civilian military defense lawyer with more than 25 years of experience defending United States service members in court-martial and UCMJ cases worldwide. A former U.S. Army JAG officer, he has served as Army Trial Defense Counsel, Senior Defense Counsel, Army prosecutor, and Special Assistant United States Attorney.

Mr. Waddington is a lifetime member of the National Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers, serves on its Military Law Committee, and has been selected as a Super Lawyers honoree, a Top 100 Trial Lawyer by the National Trial Lawyers organization, and a Fellow of the American Board of Criminal Lawyers — an exclusive, invitation-only honorary society of about 200 criminal trial lawyers nationwide. To be invited, a lawyer must have at least 10 years as a criminal defense trial lawyer, at least 20 felony jury trials, and at least five major felony cases that ended in acquittal or a substantially reduced verdict, plus recommendations from three judges.

He is the best-selling author of 14 books on criminal defense, cross-examination, trial strategy, sexual assault defense, and the UCMJ. He serves as an adjunct professor of law at Florida International University College of Law and has been featured by CNN, 60 Minutes, and ABC News.

Attorney Profile

Alexandra González-Waddington – Military Defense Lawyer

Alexandra González-Waddington is a civilian military defense lawyer with 23 years of experience defending service members in high-stakes court-martial and UCMJ cases worldwide. As a founding partner of Gonzalez & Waddington, she has led major military sexual assault and war-crimes defenses arising from the Iraq and Afghanistan conflicts and has represented hundreds of clients accused of violent crimes, sexual assault, and white-collar offenses in military and state courts.

Ms. González-Waddington began her career as a Public Defender in Georgia’s Augusta Judicial Circuit and holds a Juris Doctor from Temple University Beasley School of Law, where she completed the nationally ranked Integrated Trial Advocacy Program. She is bilingual in English and Spanish.

She is the author of 9 books on trial advocacy, UCMJ law, sexual assault defense, digital forensics, and DNA cross-examination, and her work has been featured by Fox News, 60 Minutes, CNN, and Rolling Stone.

Attorney Profile

Defending service members worldwide

From our office in Weston, Florida, Gonzalez & Waddington defends service members wherever they are stationed. Most military investigations are handled remotely by phone and video, and we travel to you for trials, boards, and other hearings where we need to be in the room to fight for you.

World map showing where Gonzalez & Waddington has defended service members, from its Florida office to installations in the United States, Europe, the Middle East, and Asia — Selected places where we have defended service members, including Fort Bragg, Camp Lejeune, Norfolk, Fort Benning, Fort Gordon, Hurlburt Field, Eglin AFB, Mobile, Fort Hood, Luke AFB, Germany, Italy, Poland, Iraq, Afghanistan, South Korea, and Japan.

How it works when your lawyer isn’t local · Installations we serve

Defense Across the Army, Navy, Air Force, Marine Corps, Space Force, and Coast Guard

UCMJ Military Criminal Defense Lawyer - United States Army

UCMJ Military Criminal Defense Lawyer - United States Navy

UCMJ Military Criminal Defense Lawyer - United States Marine Corps

UCMJ Military Criminal Defense Lawyer - United States Air Force

UCMJ Military Criminal Defense Lawyer - United States Coast Guard

Gonzalez & Waddington represent service members across every branch of the United States Armed Forces. Our civilian military defense lawyers handle courts-martial, UCMJ investigations, Article 15 proceedings, Boards of Inquiry, administrative separations, and serious felony prosecutions worldwide.

Explore branch-specific defense resources below:

Each branch operates under the Uniform Code of Military Justice but follows distinct investigative practices, disciplinary procedures, and administrative processes. Our defense strategy accounts for those differences while protecting your rights, career, retirement, and future.

Google Guaranteed service provider badge

The National Trial Lawyers Top 100 badge

UCMJ Survival Guide: The Complete Military Justice Manual

Check Out Our Newest Book

UCMJ Survival Guide is a comprehensive military justice manual written by Michael Waddington and Alexandra González-Waddington for service members and their families facing investigations, courts-martial, Article 15 proceedings, or administrative separation. The book covers investigation rights, command-action defenses, Article 120 and 128b allegations, and strategies for protecting careers, retirement, and reputation under the Uniform Code of Military Justice.

The authors have successfully defended service members in high-profile Article 120 UCMJ sexual assault cases, complex courts-martial, and administrative separation proceedings across all branches of the U.S. military. Available on Amazon.

Buy now on Amazon button for UCMJ legal book

UCMJ criminal defense book authored by Michael Waddington

How to Choose a Civilian Military Defense Lawyer: Eight Criteria That Matter Most

Choosing a civilian military defense lawyer is one of the most consequential decisions a service member will make. The criteria below reflect how experienced defense lawyers evaluate each other and how clients can distinguish real expertise from marketing.

The Eight Criteria That Matter Most:

1. How many years has the lawyer focused on military law?

A qualified civilian military defense lawyer should have spent the majority of their career on military law — not general criminal defense with occasional UCMJ cases. Look for at least ten years of focused court-martial, administrative separation board, and UCMJ litigation experience. Michael Waddington has 25+ years and Alexandra González-Waddington has 23 years of exclusive military-law focus.

2. What is the lawyer’s reputation among other defense lawyers?

Other criminal defense attorneys are the most reliable judges of trial skill. Membership in invitation-only organizations such as the American Board of Criminal Lawyers, leadership positions in the National Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers, and frequent invitations to lecture at continuing legal education programs are stronger signals than paid awards or marketing-driven recognitions.

3. Has the lawyer tried serious felony-level cases to verdict?

Court-martial outcomes are decided at trial, not in settlement. A qualified military defense lawyer should have tried multiple General Courts-Martial involving felony-level charges — Article 120, Article 128b, homicide, or comparable offenses — to a verdict. Ask specifically about contested trials, not negotiated pleas.

4. Does the lawyer have published authority in the field?

Lawyers who write the books, articles, and treatises that other attorneys read are recognized as authorities in their field. Michael Waddington has written 14 books and Alexandra González-Waddington nine on military criminal defense, cross-examination, sexual assault defense, UCMJ law, digital forensics, and DNA cross-examination, used by defense attorneys and law students nationwide.

5. Does the lawyer teach trial advocacy or military law?

Teaching credentials are a strong indicator of mastery. Michael Waddington serves as an adjunct professor of law at Florida International University College of Law. Both attorneys lecture nationally on cross-examination, UCMJ litigation, and military trial strategy.

6. Has the lawyer been recognized by national media?

Media coverage by national outlets reflects independent recognition of a lawyer’s expertise. Gonzalez & Waddington has been featured by CNN, 60 Minutes, BBC, ABC News, Fox News, and Rolling Stone, primarily in connection with major military sexual assault, war-crimes, and high-profile court-martial cases.

7. Does the lawyer practice exclusively in military law?

Lawyers who divide their attention across personal injury, divorce, DUI, and military cases cannot maintain the depth required for serious UCMJ defense. A qualified civilian military defense firm should focus exclusively on court-martial defense, UCMJ investigations, and administrative military actions.

8. Is the lawyer directly accessible, or does work get passed to associates?

In a high-stakes military case, the senior attorney whose name is on the firm should be directly involved in your defense. Gonzalez & Waddington intentionally limits its caseload so that Michael Waddington and Alexandra González-Waddington remain personally involved from investigation through trial.

Video transcript

Transcript of the video “Court-Martial Defense Lawyers — Gonzalez & Waddington,” from Gonzalez & Waddington.

Read the full transcript of this video

In our family, we believe everybody in America has a duty to serve their country in some capacity. I enlisted in the Army in 1993, when I was in high school, and I went on to become a JAG officer. In my second tour, I volunteered to defend someone accused of torturing and allegedly murdering prisoners in Bagram prison, and basically helped blow open the prisoner abuse program that the CIA was running. After that, in 2006, I resigned and joined my wife in law practice, and we’ve been practicing together since.

We’re a husband-and-wife team, and we work on all of our cases together. Very selective cases that we do take, because we live this every day. We talk about our cases at breakfast. We talk about our cases during lunch. We’re involved in our cases at dinner.

These are our dinner conversations. Because when we do get involved in these cases, we get involved in them fully. We’re all in.

I love what I do. I love what we stand for. I love dealing with our clients and working with them. That’s kind of my favorite part: the counseling, the advising, guiding them through the situation. I like to think of myself kind of as a light at the end of the tunnel for them.

I’ve been in the Navy for 13 years, and I’ve never been in any trouble, so getting kicked out of the Navy was my biggest fear. Every time I would talk to Mr. Waddington or anybody from the firm, they always made me feel like I was first priority. They work with you consistently. It’s just amazing.

And the feeling of knowing that I get to continue my career is a huge weight off my shoulder. There’s nothing I could do that would amount to how much I appreciate the law firm. Thank you, Mr. Waddington, and the firm.

This year we’re going to be doing a book signing for our new book, called Kick-Ass Closings. It’s a compilation of closing arguments from some of the most legendary trial lawyers over the past 50 years, in some of the most high-profile trials. It’s a great way to pass on the wisdom to younger generations, and to allow others out there to kind of learn from our experiences and share the knowledge.

I’m so grateful for Michael and Alexandra and the firm. It’s worth every single penny, especially when somebody falsely accuses you and the government has unlimited resources. They have so much power; you have none. If I didn’t have Michael, I probably would have taken a deal, like a lot of these young kids. Hire a civilian lawyer, because they will fight all the way.

What we try to do with our cases is instill hope and encouragement in our clients, because a lot of times when they call us, they’re scared. They have no hope. They were told there’s no option, they’re going down: you’re going to jail, you’re going to be a sex offender, you’re never going to see your family again, you’re going to jail for 50 years, whatever. When we get on board, and they decide to hire us and that they want to fight, then we’re going to fight.

We are not the law firm that people want to hire if they’re planning on pleading guilty. They know we are the ones that they hire to fight, and that’s what we do. We go in there and we fight their case, and we do everything that we can, and we give it all to get them the best result that they can possibly get.

Frequently Asked Questions

Do I need a civilian military defense lawyer if I already have a military defense counsel?

Hiring an experienced civilian military defense lawyer in serious cases can bring additional experience and skill to your defense team. Military defense counsel are detailed to your case, and some carry heavy caseloads. In high-stakes cases involving Article 120, Article 120b, domestic violence, or complex digital evidence, many service members hire a civilian military defense lawyer for added trial experience, independent strategy, and aggressive motion practice.

Who is the best military defense lawyer?

There is no single “best” military defense lawyer for every case. The right lawyer depends on the type of charge, trial experience, familiarity with Article 120 and serious felony litigation, and the ability to aggressively challenge CID, NCIS, OSI, or CGIS investigations. Service members facing high-stakes court-martial cases often seek civilian military defense lawyers with extensive trial backgrounds and nationwide experience.

When should I hire a military defense lawyer during a CID, NCIS, OSI, or CGIS investigation?

Immediately. Before giving statements, consenting to searches, or turning over electronic devices. Early intervention by a civilian military defense lawyer can influence how evidence is collected, how interviews are conducted, and whether charges are ultimately preferred.

What should I do if CID or NCIS asks to search my phone or computer?

Do not consent without speaking to a lawyer. Digital evidence in Article 120, computer crime, or online sting cases is often misinterpreted. Once a device is seized and forensically imaged, the government controls the evidence timeline.

What is the difference between Article 120, Article 120b, and Article 120c under the UCMJ?

Article 120 generally covers adult sexual assault allegations.
Article 120b addresses alleged offenses involving a child.
Article 120c includes certain sexual misconduct offenses such as indecent recording or non-consensual image distribution.
Each carries different elements, defenses, and sentencing exposure.

If both parties were drinking, can the government still prove Article 120 sexual assault?

Yes, but intoxication does not automatically prove guilt. Alcohol often creates conflicting memory accounts, credibility disputes, and evidentiary gaps. The government must still prove each element beyond a reasonable doubt.

What is the difference between Article 15 (NJP) and a court-martial?

Article 15, also known as Non-Judicial Punishment, is a command-level disciplinary process. A court-martial is a criminal trial under the Uniform Code of Military Justice with formal rules of evidence and greater punishment exposure. The decision to accept NJP or demand trial requires careful legal analysis.

Can I be administratively separated without a court-martial conviction?

Yes. Administrative Separation Boards (ADSEP) and Boards of Inquiry (BOI) can end a military career even without a criminal conviction. These proceedings focus on retention standards, not criminal guilt.

Do you represent service members stationed overseas?

Yes. Gonzalez & Waddington regularly defend service members worldwide in UCMJ investigations, court-martial cases, and administrative separation boards.
The firm frequently handles military justice cases in Germany, Japan, South Korea, Italy, Spain, and the United Kingdom, along with other overseas duty stations.
If you are stationed abroad and facing UCMJ action, distance does not prevent you from hiring experienced civilian military defense counsel to protect your career and reputation.

How long does a military criminal investigation or court-martial take?

There is no fixed timeline. Some investigations resolve in weeks; others last months before charges are preferred. The defense strategy should assume delays and prioritize early evidence preservation and witness development.

Is a consultation with a military defense lawyer confidential?

Yes. Consultations are confidential. However, communications with friends, coworkers, or on social media are not protected and may later be used as evidence.