Applying sentence credits

Overview of applying sentence credits (see Pretrial restraint & pretrial confinement in the military):

navydefenselawyersPretrial confinement credit applies to the approved sentence and in United States v. Rock, 52 M.J. 154 (C.A.A.F. 1999), the Court of Appeals held that credit applies to an adjudged sentence, unless there is a pre-trial agreement that provides for a lesser sentence, in which case it applies to the lesser sentence. In United States v. Spaustat, 57 M.J. 256 (C.A.A.F. 2002), the Court confirmed and clarified its ruling in Rock by establishing a bright line rule for all courts (effective August 30th, 2002). The rule states:

[I]n order to avoid further confusion and to ensure meaningful relief in all future cases after the date of this decision, this Court will require the convening authority to direct application of all confinement credits for violations of Article 13 or RCM 305 and all Allen credit against the approved sentence, i.e., the lesser of the adjudged sentence or the sentence that may be approved under the pretrial agreement, as further reduced by any clemency granted by the convening authority, unless the pretrial agreement provides otherwise. Id. at 263.

After receiving non-judicial punishment and being tried for the same offense, a servicemember must get complete credit for any prior punishment, “day-for-day, dollar-for-dollar, stripe-for-stripe.” United States v. Pierce, 27 M.J. 367 (C.M.A. 1989). The method to reconcile punishments that do not directly convert is as follows: “Extra duty for 45 days is equivalent to 60 days’ restriction (1½ for 2); add the 45 days’ restriction also imposed = 105 days’ restriction. Confinement for 1 day is equivalent to 2 days’ restriction, so 105 days’ restriction = 52 ½ days’ confinement.” Id. at n. 5.

After receiving non-judicial punishment

all future cases